Skip to main content

Give a character sketch of Dinah Morris.



Q 4: 
Give a character sketch of Dinah Morris.
 Answer: 
 To most of the readers sweet pity of 
Dinah seems distasteful. It seems like too much of a good thing. But this reaction is based on an unhistorical view of the character, it is not valid.
Dinah Morris’s style of speech seems quite odd to the modern reader but this was a fact that such type of speech was common in 18th century. The reader of 21st century finds it unnatural but
George Eliot was creating a historically accurate picture and this should be kept in mind while judging her characters. On the other hand, this wrong reaction to Dinah’s character is quite valid. Most critics of the world urge that Dinah is not a realistic character. She is an ideal and a perfect woman who has no fault. Perhaps she is the personification of abstract goal of Eliot’s ethical system. There are perfect no women in the world, nor there likely to be.
Dinah is rather clearly inhuman in her piety. Without any doubt
Dinah is a good woman. She is completely dedicated to the Lord’s work. Wherever she encounters suffering, she tries to alleviate it. She has spent her whole life in deeds of charity. Dinah’s piety is not an abstract one. She preaches what she believes and practices what she preaches. Through long experience she had discovered how to comfort people and bring them to God. In the course of novel, she had a good effect on everyone she comes in contact with.
Dinah is also entirely humble. She considers herself as the servant of the people. She is a working woman and no task is too mean for her. She visits afflicted people in prison and in their simple cottages and she shares their hard life with them.
 The close study of the novel makes it quite evident that she is absolutely selfless. She never allows any thought of her own comfort to interfere with the performance of her duty. She looks upon her own desires as temptations which must be restricted. She always places God before man and other people before herself. And finally she is totally benevolent.
Dinah never does anything which is not likely to have good effects. She has no dislikes and she treats everyone with respect and sympathy. No one in the novel disapproves her behaviour. She is universally praised by all who know her. Dinah gives up her life of taking care and preaching when she marries
 Adam. But, she takes this step only after assuring herself that it is God’s will and her basic personality does not change at all.
Dinah remains at the end what she was at the beginning. She was a morally perfect woman with the face and bearing of an angle and the heart of a saint. To conclude, we may say that
George Eliot has presented Dinah as a symbol of womanly virtue and as a very caring character. She is affectionate, cooperating, sympathetic and very tender hearted. We learn from different parts of the novel about her generosity and large-heartedness. Every critic has shown his appreciation for Dinah for her harmless nature and her appealing personality.
George Eliot has certainly presented a larger than life character in the figure of Dinah. The readers have naturally great regard for her. Her personality gives a very sober colour to the entire action of the novel. The inner piety of the novelist reflects through the noble character of Dinah.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical side of man, while Vladimir represents the intellectual side of man. In each way

Waiting for Godot: A play in which nothing happens twice

A Play in Which Nothing Happens Twice    Translated into over a dozen languages, Waiting for Godot has been performed in little theatres and large theatres, by amateurs and professionals, on radio and television. Scarcely four decades old, Waiting for Godot has sold over a million copies in the original French and nearly that many in Beckett’s own English translation. Starring Steve Martin and Robin Williams, it was a smash hit at the Lincoln Center Theatre, with tickets available by lottery only. Quite an achievement for a comic drama in which absolutely nothing happens. (One reviewer, in fact, called it a two-act play in which nothing happens twice.) Waiting for Godot contains clowning of the highest degree, which attracts audiences, and likely the play’s enigma contributes to its appeal. Its symbolism is obscure or non- existent; its “message” is individual to each audience member, and the “nothing happens” becomes our daily existence. On a lonely country road near a tree, two eld

Walt Whitman Writing Style

  Walt Whitman style Walt Whitman crafted one of the most distinctive styles in world poetry – a style that is instantly recognizable.  Among the particular trait s of that style are the following: a strong emphasis on the individual self, especially the self of Whitman in particular a strong tendency to use free verse in his poetry an epic tendency that tries to encompass almost every possible subject matter an emphasis on the real details of the everyday world but also on transcendent, spiritual themes an emphasis on life as it was actually lived in America , and yet a concern with all humanity; a focus on reality blended with an enthusiastic mysticism an emphasis on democracy and love of other persons an emphasis on speakers (in his poems) speaking honestly and directly, in fairly simple language accessible to most readers an emphasis on freedom of all sorts – physical freedom, social freedom, freedom of the imagination, and fre