Discuss Bacon as a Moralist.

-


BACON AS AMORALIST:

Bacon is certainly a moralist and he appears in that role in his essays. His essays abound in moral percepts. He lays down valuable guidelines for human conduct. He urges human beings to follow the right path in every field of life--- political, social, domestic, etc. The essay, Of Truth, is frankly didactic. The object of the writer is to instill into the minds of the readers a love of truth. A man’s mind, says he, should “turn upon the poles of truth.” All the reasoning of human beings, says Bacon, should base upon truth... “Clear and round dealing is the honour of man’s nature. ….For these winding and crooked courses are the goings of the serpent, which goeth basely upon the belly, and not upon the feet. He goes on to Montaigne who said that, in telling a lie, a man was brave towards God but a coward towards his fellow-men. Concluding the essay, Bacon says that falsehood is wicked and such wickedness will duly receive its punishment on the doomsday. Indeed, much of the essay is a moral sermon.

In the essay, Of Suitors, Bacon says that a man should refuse to undertake a suit rather than undertake it by giving a false hope to the petitioner. After having undertaken a suit, a man should keep telling the petitioner exactly how much he has made progress in the case. Furthermore, he should ask for a reward for only that much of the service that he has actually rendered. A man who has undertaken a suit should not take under advantage of any information, which is available to him through a petitioner. If he finds it difficult to promote a   suit, he should allow the petitioner to approach somebody else for help. Those who undertake suits and employ all kinds of crooked methods in having them granted or rejected are the worst offenders in society. Bacon shows the same high respect for moral principles in some of his other essays. For example, “A man that hath no virtue in himself ever envieth virtue in others” (Of Envy). “The desire of power in excess caused the angels to fall; the desire of knowledge in excess caused man to fall; but in charity there is no excess; neither can angel or man come in danger by it” (Of Goodness and Goodness of Nature). The author of such principles was a man who theoretically at least cherished a profound love and respect for justice: “The principal duty of a judge is to suppress force and fraud” (Of Judicature).

However, Bacon is not a moral idealist. He does preach morality but not ideal morality. The kind of morality he preaches has a tinge of worldliness. We might even say that his guiding principle is appropriateness, while morality is a secondary consideration. We cannot even claim that he was certain of the existence of moral principles of absolute validity. His essays seem to be the work of an opportunist. In the essay, Of Truth, he certainly admires truth but then he also points out that falsehood is like alloy in gold and silver, which makes metal better, even though it lowers the value of metal. By pointing out this, he dilutes all that he has said in this essay in praise of truth. It is obvious that Bacon is concerned only with worldly success, and that he intends with his morality to help people achieve worldly success. In other words, Bacon shows his concern for an individual’s success in life rather than a concern for absolute morals or for any absolute ethical standards.

 In short, Bacon’s principles are sensible. Bacon appears to be looking down from a height and determining what course of conduct pays best. He condemns cunning, not as a hateful thing but as a thing that is unwise. Occasionally he even lays down the rules for immoral conduct without a word of open disapproval. For this reason, critics regard Bacon’s morality as a cynical wisdom. The essays, which deal with domestic relations, by their tone and substance, also confirm this impression. His view of friendship is purely and fundamentally utilitarian. Friendship gives comfort to heart; light to understanding and help in affairs of life. Thus, Bacon gives it a high value. Bacon throws no hint that a man may get a noble position by a deed of pure selflessness. In the essay, Of Marriages and Single Life, Bacon says that wife and children are hostages to fortune. According to Bacon, they are discipline of Humanity. However, he hardly seems to be aware of any wider influence. He emphasizes the utility of wife by saying that for a young man a wife is a mistress, for a middle-aged man she is a companion, and for an old man she serves as a nurse. His view of love is also devoid of any passion or intense emotion. He looks upon love as “the child of folly” and urges his readers to serve it wholly from the serious affairs and actions of life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biographical sketch of aristotle

-
                 Aristotle Biography:biographical sketch   Aristotle was born in 384 BC, in Stagira, near Macedonia at the northern end of the Aegean Sea. His father, Nicomachus, was the family physician of King Amyntas of Macedonia. It is believed that Aristotle's ancestors had been the physicians of the Macedonian royal family for several generations. Having come from a long line of physicians, Aristotle received training and education that inclined his mind toward the study of natural phenomena. This education had long-lasting influences, and was probably the root cause of his less idealistic stand on philosophy as opposed to Plato. Aristotle's father died when he was a boy, and Aristotle was left under the care of his guardian Proxenus. When Aristotle was seventeen, Proxenus sent him to study at Plato's Academy in Athens, the heart of the intellectual world at the time. Aristotle remained ...
notesvilla.ml

Q: WHAT IS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"?

-
Q:      WHAT IS   SIGNIFICANCE   OF THE   TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:      IT    IS NOT GODOT BUT WAITING THAT MAKES THE WHOLE PLAY. HOW CAN YOU MAKE A CONVINCING CASE? Ans: Waiting for Godot is a multi—sided play with significant title. Its meanings and implications are complex. It is possible to look upon it as a clever farce or view it as a tragic exposition of human predicament. Its themes have certain topicality but at the same time, they possess a timeless validity and universality. It is an existentialistic play but at the same time mocks at the attitude of existentialism. It seems to have some religious implications even though it seems of be questioning profoundly the Christian concept of salvation and grace. The title "Waiting for Godot," suggests waiting for a mysterious stranger who has obvious symbolic dimensions and implication. Godot may be a representative, in Beckett's contemporary term ...
notesvilla.ml

Swift as Misanthropist

-
Swift as Misanthropist Jonathan Swift is undoubtedly is a great artist. He had to face unreasonable and prejudiced criticism in the hands of his contemporaries, because he had unveiled the brutality of man which was hidden under the mask of humanism. Swift’s age was full of vices of corruption but still the people were satisfied. Swift gives us a true picture of the man of that age in “Gulliver’s Travels”. In the last voyage, his satire becomes very bitter when he presents horses more reasonable than man. Swift is notorious for being misanthropist in the last part of the “Gulliver’s Travels”.  Swift has to face the allegation of being misanthropist for during whole of his life. It is because the critics attributed Gulliver’s blunders to Swift. But, he makes his aim in “Gulliver’s Travels” clear in his letter to Alexander Pope. He says, “The chief end of all my labour is to vex the world, rather than divert it”. Secondly, he declares that “He has ever hated all the nation...
notesvilla.ml