Skip to main content

Discuss Eliot’s psychological approach in “Adam Bede”.



Q 7: 
Discuss George Eliot’s realism.
Or 
What are the biographical elements in “Adam Bede”? 
Or 
Discuss the dear reader technique of George Eliot in “Adam Bede”.
Or 
Discuss Eliot’s psychological approach in “Adam Bede”.
 Answer: 
George Eliot 
has been considered as the intellectual novelist. For every intellectual novelist realism is necessary, but for Eliot it is a creed and ambition. She declares her stories as “a criticism of life”; hence she draws her stories from actual life. She draws her own model and deals everything with devoted and sincere truthfulness. Whereas, such truthfulness is missing in Dickens and Faulkner, rather there is an air of artificiality in their work. Eliot says:
“Falsehood is so easy, truth is so difficult.” 
But for writer like Eliot’s intellect, it is very difficult to create falsehood. In Eliot’s time, the “dear reader” technique was widely used. The method derives from the conception that since fiction was literally  untrue hence was a deception and morally unhealthy. 18th century writers, especially Defoe took pains to insist that their novels were real account of true happenings. Although, 19th century gradually came to accept fiction as fiction, the custom of speaking directly to the readers would do persisted. It took novel another forty years to take its place as a serious art form. Through out “Adam Bede”, Eliot pretends that it is a true story. She takes the position of one who is merely recording events as heard by her. Almost all the background of her stories arises from her early childhood memories of the Warwickshire countryside. For this reason she says that her novels are her “experience of life”. Though there is great contribution and blend of imagination, yet description have a warmth and colour of memory. In “
 Adam Bede 
” events of the story take place in 1799 i.e. about half a century before it is written, yet
George Eliot 
shows such a clear picture of past, that to many older people it reminds the era of their early years or childhood. Hays lope world is as true as any village in England. Eliot draws her characters from real life. In “
 Adam Bede 
” she describes that
Dinah Morris is a pen picture of her own Methodist aunt, Mrs. Samuel Evans. Though, her aunt is not like
Dinah 
in her softness and beauty, yet the main idea is taken from her. Even the main theme of the story i.e. confession and execution of a woman, on murdering her child, is taken from account of a similar incident by Eliot’s same aunt. Thus she tries to make it more real by using original story. It is said that her character of 
 Adam 
, resembles Eliot’s father very closely. Her power of observation goes hand in hand with her memory and imagination. It is her deep observation of people’s behaviour in daily life, which makes her character more close to reality. Mrs. Poyser represents true wit and humour of a pure countrywoman of that time. It is said that she had some characteristics of Eliot’s mother. Through
 Arthur 
Eliot bitterly satirizes the general behaviour and customs of landlords. Eliot also depicts the ‘psychological realism’ in her novels. She has deep insight in her human nature and she unveils its weaknesses. Her stories define a certain ‘moral conflict’ of human life; the conflict of duty and desire, of heart and head, of mind and soul. The inner world of her characters is more important to her than the outer one. She skillfully penetrates to the inner-self of her character and thus exposes them. Eliot’s keen observation of human nature is also visible in the minor incidents of the novel. For instance, man’s natural selfishness is revealed through various characters. As when
Hetty resolves to forgive
 Arthur 
, it is also for the sake of her own salvation. Another example of Eliot’s intellect and insight inhuman nature is shown in the marriage of Adam with Dinah. It expresses man natural instinct to escape from pain and suffering, and that every passion losses its intensity with the passage of time. Eliot has been criticized on grounds of exaggerating in some cases. An objection is raised that she has made
Hetty 
’s sufferings prolonged and acute, and she does not deserve such extremely harsh treatment. The reason might be so that being a moralist; Eliot could not spare even the slightest moral lapse in her female characters. Another, objection is that
“she has made Adam and Dinah” too good to be true” 
. Their excessive goodness makes them unreal. But this was done by Eliot with a definite aim to reject the popular notion of her time that all men and women are mere temptress.
 In short, George Eliot’s wisdom, intellect and imagination do not go for from reality. Her insight into human nature brings the very truth about ourselves in front of us also. It is her trait which differ her from other Victorians and make her first in the queue of modern novelists.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical side of man, while Vladimir represents the intellectual side of man. In each way

Waiting for Godot: A play in which nothing happens twice

A Play in Which Nothing Happens Twice    Translated into over a dozen languages, Waiting for Godot has been performed in little theatres and large theatres, by amateurs and professionals, on radio and television. Scarcely four decades old, Waiting for Godot has sold over a million copies in the original French and nearly that many in Beckett’s own English translation. Starring Steve Martin and Robin Williams, it was a smash hit at the Lincoln Center Theatre, with tickets available by lottery only. Quite an achievement for a comic drama in which absolutely nothing happens. (One reviewer, in fact, called it a two-act play in which nothing happens twice.) Waiting for Godot contains clowning of the highest degree, which attracts audiences, and likely the play’s enigma contributes to its appeal. Its symbolism is obscure or non- existent; its “message” is individual to each audience member, and the “nothing happens” becomes our daily existence. On a lonely country road near a tree, two eld

Walt Whitman Writing Style

  Walt Whitman style Walt Whitman crafted one of the most distinctive styles in world poetry – a style that is instantly recognizable.  Among the particular trait s of that style are the following: a strong emphasis on the individual self, especially the self of Whitman in particular a strong tendency to use free verse in his poetry an epic tendency that tries to encompass almost every possible subject matter an emphasis on the real details of the everyday world but also on transcendent, spiritual themes an emphasis on life as it was actually lived in America , and yet a concern with all humanity; a focus on reality blended with an enthusiastic mysticism an emphasis on democracy and love of other persons an emphasis on speakers (in his poems) speaking honestly and directly, in fairly simple language accessible to most readers an emphasis on freedom of all sorts – physical freedom, social freedom, freedom of the imagination, and fre