Skip to main content

Discuss George Eliot’s art of characterization with special reference to “Adam Bede’



Q 2: 
Discuss George Eliot’s art of characterization with special reference to “Adam Bede’.
 Answer: 
In novel writing, like the dramatic art the significance of characterization cannot be denied. Particularly the modern novelists lay great emphasis on the true and forceful delineation of characters. The great the quality of characterization, the higher is the appeal of fiction writing. This is exactly what we find in almost all the great writings of 
George Eliot 
. She is rightly credited with introducing an almost revolutionary change in the delineation and presentation of characters. The novelists of later generation have fully acknowledged the greatness of 
George Eliot 
in this regard.
D. H Lawrence, one of the most influential modern novelists pays tribute to
George Eliot in the following words:
“It was she who started it all; it was she who started to put all the action inside her characters.” 
George Eliot’s skill in characterization is now fully recognized, though it is generally believed that this mastery is exhibited only in
“Middlemarch” and more particularly in the
“Mill on the Floss”.
To some degree Eliot’s matchless skill is shown equally well in “Adam Bede”, her first full length novel. Even here her characters are made perfectly credible and their motives are fully established. It has been mentioned by many critics that she exposes all the complex feelings of spirit that strike at the doors of disturb conscious. She describes the action before it is committed. She reveals the actions when they are taking shape into the hearts. When they are committed their ugliness is exposed. For instances, the character of 
 Arthur is the best example of the change brought in by the novelist herself. In portraying this particular character, she lays bare all the conscious as well as semi-conscious emotions which compel him to action. We see the working of his inner most mind. The characterization in “Adam Bede” is absolutely vivid and memorable. In the words of a modern critic,
“There is not a single character in the novel which is not perfectly drawn, even if the portrait is but a sketch still it is a true one. Even the character of Mr. Irwin, the person, is very carefully drawn and plays a very impressive role in the final predicament of Hetty. His religious learning has made him a very sensible and caring figure. The sufferings and agonies of humanity seem to him his own sufferings. He extends full cooperation to anybody who undergoes injustice, oppression and unfair treatment. Even such a minor character finds full opportunity to make a mark on the readers.” 
 The other critic, Hennery James and Gerald Bullet have found some irregularities in the characterization in “
 Adam Bede 
”. For example, it is their belief that the major characters like Adam and Dinah do not arouse the desired interest. They also claim that the character of Mrs. Poysers has been over praised. Both these critics are unanimous in their opinion that Hetty has been the most successful creation of all the characters. Her innocence, great interest in life, her sharing capability, and great interest in human psyche and her free and frank attitude in all matters of life make her a very complete character, the most suitable for the modern day fiction. The whole gallery of characters, from major to minor, has been beautifully projected to create desired effect. The perfection and imperfection of the personalities of different characters make a wonderful sense of literary triumph by the great novelist. The peak of characterization becomes self-evident when we glance at the variety of characters, roles they perform and the inner coordination that they exhibit at every level. The psychological pattern of inner thinking is the hallmark of special gift of characterization of George Eliot. The complex feelings keep on adding to the overall effect and the thematic interpretations of the different segments of the plot. The collective picture that emerges out of this fine blend of action and characterization is a gem indeed. No other novelist of George Eliot’s era can claim to have produced such marvelous interlink and psychological treatment at such an artistic level. Characterization is definitely a special feature of George Eliot’s art of novel writing, which is difficult to surpass. 
To conclude, it can be said with absolute confidence that the writing of George Eliot are full of unique characters which are larger than life. The typical flavour of 
George Eliot’s own personality gives colour and broader dimension to her characters. The matchless characters are the proud product of strong mind of the writer.
 Adam, Hetty, Dinah and few others testify this reality.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for Godot: A play in which nothing happens twice

A Play in Which Nothing Happens Twice    Translated into over a dozen languages, Waiting for Godot has been performed in little theatres and large theatres, by amateurs and professionals, on radio and television. Scarcely four decades old, Waiting for Godot has sold over a million copies in the original French and nearly that many in Beckett’s own English translation. Starring Steve Martin and Robin Williams, it was a smash hit at the Lincoln Center Theatre, with tickets available by lottery only. Quite an achievement for a comic drama in which absolutely nothing happens. (One reviewer, in fact, called it a two-act play in which nothing happens twice.) Waiting for Godot contains clowning of the highest degree, which attracts audiences, and likely the play’s enigma contributes to its appeal. Its symbolism is obscure or non- existent; its “message” is individual to each audience member, and the “nothing happens” becomes our daily existence. On a lonely country road near a tree...

Q: WHAT IS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"?

Q:      WHAT IS   SIGNIFICANCE   OF THE   TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:      IT    IS NOT GODOT BUT WAITING THAT MAKES THE WHOLE PLAY. HOW CAN YOU MAKE A CONVINCING CASE? Ans: Waiting for Godot is a multi—sided play with significant title. Its meanings and implications are complex. It is possible to look upon it as a clever farce or view it as a tragic exposition of human predicament. Its themes have certain topicality but at the same time, they possess a timeless validity and universality. It is an existentialistic play but at the same time mocks at the attitude of existentialism. It seems to have some religious implications even though it seems of be questioning profoundly the Christian concept of salvation and grace. The title "Waiting for Godot," suggests waiting for a mysterious stranger who has obvious symbolic dimensions and implication. Godot may be a representative, in Beckett's contemporary term ...

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical ...