Skip to main content

William Shakepeare Biography section 2





Text Box: What did Shakespeare look like?

Shakespeare and the Sanders Portrait
The short answer is that we don't know. There are a number of portraits, but which one (if any) depicts the "real" Shakespeare? We know roughly what he might have worn given his time and his class, and the clothing shown in the portraits seems authentic, but which face belongs to this enigmatic figure?
One candidate has a distinctly Canadian connection.
The Sanders Portrait: An
An exciting discovery came to light in 2001 in Ottawa. Incredibly, a previously unknown portrait of William Shakespeare, painted by one John Sanders, had been found: it had been kept for generations in a cupboard in the upstairs hall of the Sullivans, a Canadian family descended from the same John Sanders. The portrait was painted in oil on wood, and a label on the back read:
“Shakspere, born April 23rd 1564, died April 23rd 1616, aged 52, this likeness taken 1603, age at that time 39 years.”
Initial scientific tests indicated that the frame, paint and stye are consistent with 17th-century painting. Later tests showed that the ink and the material of the label are genuine. The portrait has not been re-touched, nor was it painted on top of an older picture. Although the scientific results prove that the portrait is genuine, they cannot confirm that the image is in fact the Bard, as even if the label is genuine it could only have been written some time after his death.
In May 2001, acting on a tip from her mother, Globe and Mail journalist Stephanie Nolen met with Loyd Sullivan in Ottawa to discuss the painting that may be a portrait of Shakespeare. (Sullivan inherited the painting from his mother in 1972.) She wrote,
"Lloyd Sullivan believed he knew this much from family tradition: the portrait was painted a dozen generations ago by his ancestor,
John Sanders, born in 1576, the eldest son of a family in Worcester, England. Young John left home to make his fortune in London. There he became an actor, or at least a bit player, in Shakespeare's company, the Lord Chamberlain's Men, which was formed in 1594, when Shakespeare was thirty. John Sanders also dabbled in oils and did odd bits of painting around the theatre. He liked to try his hand at portraiture.
And sometime in 1603, he prepared a sturdy oak panel and some bright oil paint and recorded the face of his colleague, William Shakespeare. At some point Sanders or one of his children labeled the picture 'Shakespere' (in a spelling the poet himself used), and included the playwright's birth and death dates, noting that this was his likeness at the age of thirty-nine. The portrait was handed down, passing from the first John Sanders to his son, and so on through the family." (Nolen, 10)
Stephanie Nolen later wrote Shakespeare's Face, a book about the testing of the portrait. . Five of the seven authorities she consulted in the course of
her research do not believe that the picture is of Shakespeare.
Text Box: The National Portrait Gallery in London, England, has accepted the results of these scientific tests and no retesting is required. According to Gallery experts,"However, the results of the tests that were done were conclusive: the painting was executed on wood that dated from the correct period; the materials and the way in which they were used were consistent with a painting done in England in 1603; no anachronistic material was found; and the label identifying the subject of the portrait was made of rag paper dating from 1640 at the latest. All these elements indicate that the painting is indeed an old painting and not a relatively modern copy or fake."



Marie-Claude Corbeil, Senior Conservation Scientist, Analytical Research Laboratory, Canadian Conservation Institute, Department of Canadian Heritage.
"In addition to the success of the scientific tests carried out on the Sanders portrait, recent genealogical evidence, together with a number of documents and letters that have been discovered over the past twenty years, go a long way to authenticate the portrait as being a true image of Shakespeare painted in his lifetime (1603) ."
The painting has been exhibited at the Art Gallery of Ontario (Toronto), the National Portrait Gallery (London, UK), and the Yale Center for British Art (Cambridge, Massachusetts).
The Sanders Portrait is currently in the collection of the John Rylands University Library at the University of Manchester, England.
Is the man in the Sanders Portrait the real William Shakespeare? We may never know.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical side of man, while Vladimir represents the intellectual side of man. In each way

Walt Whitman Writing Style

  Walt Whitman style Walt Whitman crafted one of the most distinctive styles in world poetry – a style that is instantly recognizable.  Among the particular trait s of that style are the following: a strong emphasis on the individual self, especially the self of Whitman in particular a strong tendency to use free verse in his poetry an epic tendency that tries to encompass almost every possible subject matter an emphasis on the real details of the everyday world but also on transcendent, spiritual themes an emphasis on life as it was actually lived in America , and yet a concern with all humanity; a focus on reality blended with an enthusiastic mysticism an emphasis on democracy and love of other persons an emphasis on speakers (in his poems) speaking honestly and directly, in fairly simple language accessible to most readers an emphasis on freedom of all sorts – physical freedom, social freedom, freedom of the imagination, and fre

Waiting for Godot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Grave

Waiting for Godot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Grave By David Kranes  Have you heard the one about the two tramps who were killing time? Or was it filling time? Is Samuel Beckett the stage poet of gloom? Or is he a baggy-pant burlesque comedian? (Bert Lahr acted in Godot; Buster Keaton in his Film.) Does the spirit involuntarily lift in the gaunt Irishman’s grove of denuded trees. . .or fall? Does the flesh fall and the voice arise? “We give birth astride the grave,” Beckett utters at one point. Some critics arm them- selves with the word birth; others with the word grave. Perhaps more of them ought to have chosen the word astride. Samuel Beckett, who always loved the shape and play of language, was fond of the epi- gram from St. Augustine: “Do not despair: one of the thieves was saved. Do not presume: one of the thieves was damned.” During this past year, in response to Beckett’s 1989 death, remembrances by writers such as Mel Gussow of the New York Times stress his quie