Skip to main content

Chaucer as a humourist.



                                   Discuss Chaucer as a Humourist?
                                              Chaucer Humour.
Chaucer, the born humourist, is called a first great multi-sided humourist of Europe. His humour does not only compel us to laugh but actually he is a monarch of many-sided humour.
According to One Critic,
                             “Chaucer is a great renaissance gentleman mocking the middle ages”
Chaucer’s humour can be used to a large extent.
The first impressive trait of his humour is his humanism because he loves mankind with their merits and demerits without any sense of enmity. But his attitude displays kindness and tolerance. For instance, We find his humanistic attitude towards The Doctor of Medicine who cures his patient by natural magic. There is none like him expert in surgery and medicine .
But he loves gold very much.
                   “For gold in physics is cordial
                   So he loved gold in special.”
We also analyse his humanistic approach in the character of Parson who is very kind religious and compassionate. He always keeps on the same string.
          “If gold ruste, what shal irone do?”
Another exceptional quality of his humour is his spontaneity. He creates humour not by any planning. He simply describe the characteristic of a character and then without planning he describes the demerits of the character and in this way he create humour spontaneously. He never becomes bitter at any stage but his main aim is to produce entertainment t us . He does not indicate the institutions of his age but he simply ridicules the follies of his age. For instance, he liberally presents the character of The Knight who is brave and has fought many battles but is shy and submissive like a bachelor girl. The wife of Bath is an excellent cloth maker She is respectable  all her . She is gap-toothed and somewhat deaf. She has five husband at church door.
                   “Husbandes at church dore she had five.”
The third striking merits of Chaucer humour is the presentation of kaleidoscopic humour. For example, we find light humour when he patronizes The Oxford Clerk who has great love for logic and study. He borrows money from his friends to buy books. We observe semi-farcical behaviour towards Wife of Bath who is rude, deaf and gap-toothed. She wants to attract men by heavy veils on Sunday.
We also analyse a surprising merit of paradoxical humour in his humour. He says something but suggests just the other. His appreciation is often criticism in disguise. For example, The Monk has no respect for the rule of S.T Maure and S.T Benedictine who teach that hunting is not good for the monk and he should lead a cloistered life. Chaucer remarks: “And I said his opinion was good.”
The  Climax of Chaucer’s tolerance comes before us when he even laughs at himself to give us delight. In the prologue, he refers himself as simple unlettered man.
“My wit is short, ye may wel understand”
Chaucer has used the device of Satire to create humour. For example, he has presented the character of the Monk and The Friar Satirically. Though the Monk loves the worldly game of hunting , he is able to be an abbot of a church. We find Satire when Chaucer mentions that the Monk disregards the biblical rule that hunters are not holy men. The Friar’s character is drawn with equal satire. The Friar’s tippet is full of pins for wives. Chaucer has used the device of irony also to create humour. He fully presents the appearance of the Prioress wearing a green rosary and a brooch . She behaves like a royal princess. She is called Madam Eglantine. Chaucer ironically says about her forehead,
          “It was almost a spane brood, I trowe.”
The Sergeant of Law looks busy but is not actually busy. The Reeve uses to give money as a loan to his master although the money belongs to the master.
To conclude we say that perhaps in the history of English literature or of all literature Chaucer introduces humour as the soul and essence of an artist’s work. Thus humour is the chief instrument of his literary expression. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical side of man, while Vladimir represents the intellectual side of man. In each way

Walt Whitman Writing Style

  Walt Whitman style Walt Whitman crafted one of the most distinctive styles in world poetry – a style that is instantly recognizable.  Among the particular trait s of that style are the following: a strong emphasis on the individual self, especially the self of Whitman in particular a strong tendency to use free verse in his poetry an epic tendency that tries to encompass almost every possible subject matter an emphasis on the real details of the everyday world but also on transcendent, spiritual themes an emphasis on life as it was actually lived in America , and yet a concern with all humanity; a focus on reality blended with an enthusiastic mysticism an emphasis on democracy and love of other persons an emphasis on speakers (in his poems) speaking honestly and directly, in fairly simple language accessible to most readers an emphasis on freedom of all sorts – physical freedom, social freedom, freedom of the imagination, and fre

Waiting for Godot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Grave

Waiting for Godot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Grave By David Kranes  Have you heard the one about the two tramps who were killing time? Or was it filling time? Is Samuel Beckett the stage poet of gloom? Or is he a baggy-pant burlesque comedian? (Bert Lahr acted in Godot; Buster Keaton in his Film.) Does the spirit involuntarily lift in the gaunt Irishman’s grove of denuded trees. . .or fall? Does the flesh fall and the voice arise? “We give birth astride the grave,” Beckett utters at one point. Some critics arm them- selves with the word birth; others with the word grave. Perhaps more of them ought to have chosen the word astride. Samuel Beckett, who always loved the shape and play of language, was fond of the epi- gram from St. Augustine: “Do not despair: one of the thieves was saved. Do not presume: one of the thieves was damned.” During this past year, in response to Beckett’s 1989 death, remembrances by writers such as Mel Gussow of the New York Times stress his quie