Skip to main content

Purpose of writing Gulliver’s Travels Or Idea behind the “Gulliver’s Travels



  Purpose of writing Gulliver’s Travels
                                    Or
     Idea behind the “Gulliver’s Travels


Undoubtedly, “Gulliver’s Travels” is the most favourite
work of Jonathon Swift. In it he has
mixed the ideas of adventure, fantasy, wonder and shock to capture the reader’s attention.
But
like all the mature works the aspect of entertainment is not neglected. Hence, the “Gulliver’sTravels” is not ‘entertainment for the sake of entertainment’. Reading the book but ignoring the
purpose behind it, would be a great injustice to this great satirical work of its age. In order to
comprehend the idea behind “Gulliver’s Travels” one needs to look into the background be
hind
this adventurous tale. “The Martinis is Sariblerus Club” made of such notables as Pope, Arbuthnot
and Gay proposed to satirize the follies and vices of learned, political, scientific and modern men.Each of the members was given a topic and Swift was to satirize the numerous and popular booksdescribing voyage to faraway lands. Swift kept the form of the voyage book but expanded histarget thus achieving a feat which has rarely been achieved in literature.
Mainly, “Gulliver’s Travels” is known for its
unforgiving satire. But as every satirist is idealist
at heart thus the purpose of satire in it is not to degrade but to ‘shame men out of their follies’.
One of the main purposes in writing this book was to finish the pride of man. There is a strongattack on politics, religion and flaws of human nature. His purpose seems to be an effort to stir hisreaders to view themselves as he viewed human beings. He saw men as creatures that were notfulfilling their obligations to be truly great. They were just trying to show themselves great. Wemust acknowledge that Swift succeeds in his purpose remarkably well.The metaphors used by Swift enhance the appeal of his work. Firstly, he took great pains tocreate the atmosphere of genuine travelogue. We are told that Gulliver was a seaman. First he isseen as a ships surgeon and then caption ships. All this provides a sense of realism. The four books
of the “Gulliver’s Travels” are also presented on parallel way. The voyages I and II focus on
criticism of various aspects of English society, while last two voyages are more preoccupied withhuman nature itself. Over all it leads to self-realization.
The metaphors used in each voyage serve Swift’s purpose quite well. The small size of 
Lilliputians is to satirize the self-imposed grandeur, rank, politics, and international wars. Wherethe Lilliputians highlight the pettiness of human pride and pretensions, the relative size of Brobdingnagians highlights the rough behavior of human. In the boyage to Laputa, Swift points outthat an excess of speculative reasoning can be negative as it takes us away from practical realitiesof life. Finally, the Houyhnhnms as the representative of perfect reasoning devoid of passions
serve dual role for Swift’s purpose. The domestic animals sh
owing more humanity than humansthrows light on the defects of human nature in the form of Yahoos. However, Swift does not wishus to be like Houyhnhnms, nor are they like ideal of human nature. He uses them to show thathow reason not with love, compassion and sympathy is inadequate to deal with many aspects of human nature.Swift also achieved the purpose of exposing social behavior, pretension, futility of 
institutions and the court intrigues. Ewald rightly says: “As a satire, the main purpose of “Gulliver’sTravels” is to show certain shortcomings in 18th century English society”. In
the first voyage,changing nature of court favours, the rope dancing and the stick climbing illustrate this point. Thereferences about high heels and low heels and then quarrel between Big-Endians and Small-Endians highlight political and religious conditions of that age in England. In the voyage toBrobdingnage, Swift masterfully uses Gulliver as a naïve spokesman of European Civilization.However, the way the kin ridicules
him and makes fun of him clear indication of writer’s command
in using irony for his purpose. But, Swift does not preach an ideal world in the form of Brobdingnage.In the third voyage, the pseudo-intellectualism and love for eternal life are mocked by Swift.In the book four, rational Houyhnhnms are contrasted to the brutal Yahoos. Gulliver idealizesHouyhnhnms. No doubt, they have pure reason but they are not human. Of course they remainideal for humans until Swift exposes them as dull, unfeeling creatures, thoroughly inhuman andbloodless.
To conclude, we may say that “Gulliver’s Travels” is vastly considered as a tragic and
pessimistic work of Swift. But when one reaches the philosophy of the writer, the view is totallyreversed. What actually was Sw
ift’s philosophy
and purpose behind this book is crystal clear in the
concluding parts of this book. In fact, Swift created the whole of “Gulliver’s Travels” in order to
give the reader a new moral lens. In short, the book is full of such deep human philosophy whoseunderstanding can enhance our knowledge of the world and man.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical side of man, while Vladimir represents the intellectual side of man. In each way

Walt Whitman Writing Style

  Walt Whitman style Walt Whitman crafted one of the most distinctive styles in world poetry – a style that is instantly recognizable.  Among the particular trait s of that style are the following: a strong emphasis on the individual self, especially the self of Whitman in particular a strong tendency to use free verse in his poetry an epic tendency that tries to encompass almost every possible subject matter an emphasis on the real details of the everyday world but also on transcendent, spiritual themes an emphasis on life as it was actually lived in America , and yet a concern with all humanity; a focus on reality blended with an enthusiastic mysticism an emphasis on democracy and love of other persons an emphasis on speakers (in his poems) speaking honestly and directly, in fairly simple language accessible to most readers an emphasis on freedom of all sorts – physical freedom, social freedom, freedom of the imagination, and fre

Waiting for Godot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Grave

Waiting for Godot: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Grave By David Kranes  Have you heard the one about the two tramps who were killing time? Or was it filling time? Is Samuel Beckett the stage poet of gloom? Or is he a baggy-pant burlesque comedian? (Bert Lahr acted in Godot; Buster Keaton in his Film.) Does the spirit involuntarily lift in the gaunt Irishman’s grove of denuded trees. . .or fall? Does the flesh fall and the voice arise? “We give birth astride the grave,” Beckett utters at one point. Some critics arm them- selves with the word birth; others with the word grave. Perhaps more of them ought to have chosen the word astride. Samuel Beckett, who always loved the shape and play of language, was fond of the epi- gram from St. Augustine: “Do not despair: one of the thieves was saved. Do not presume: one of the thieves was damned.” During this past year, in response to Beckett’s 1989 death, remembrances by writers such as Mel Gussow of the New York Times stress his quie