Skip to main content

Aristotle biography





          Biographical Briefing on Aristotle, biographical sketch of Aristotle


Directions: The following information will help your group prepare for the press conference in which one of you has been assigned to play Aristotle and the rest of you have other roles to play. To prepare for the press conference, each group member reads a section of the handout and leads a discussion of the questions following that section.
Aristotle was bom in 384 B.C. in Stagira, a small township in northern Greece. His father, a physician at the royal court of Macedonia, died while his son was still young. Aristotle then left Stagira to study at Plato’s Academy in Athens. For the next 20 years, Aristotle studied with Plato, a renowned Greek philosopher, and the circle of philosophers at the Academy. After Plato’s death in 347 B.C., Aristotle left the Academy and traveled in Greece and Asia Minor, writing and studying in academic circles. His writing covers a wide range of subjects: logic, physics, astronomy, biology, ethics, politics, rhetoric (public speaking), and literary criticism. In 342 B.C., King Philip of Macedonia asked Aristotle to become the tutor of Philip’s son, Alexander, who later became the conqueror Alexander the Great. When Alexander became king, Aristotle left Macedonia and returned to Athens, where he began his own school named the Lyceum. After Alexander’s death in 323 B.C., the Athenians became hostile to Macedonian mle. Because of his connections with Alexander and the Macedonian government, Aristotle fled Athens in 324 B.C. in fear for his life. Aristotle died the next year on the island of Euboea.
                               What subjects did he examine in his writing?
                                                   Why did Aristotle leave Athens towards the end of his life?
Text Box: © Teachers’ Curriculum InstituteAristotle considered language and speech to be critically important since the ability to reason comes from the use of language. Reason, Aristotle claimed, is what distinguishes humans from animals. Aristotle thought that people are not bom virtuous (good, morally excellent), but leam to be good. Parents teach children right from wrong by punishing them for wrong actions. It is through reason, he proposed, that children leam to separate right from wrong and are able to leam moral values. Aristotle believed that over time, humankind has evolved to higher and higher forms of development. The development of the polls (political community or society) represents the highest stage in this development. People exercising reason can join together in societies through their understanding that the common good is more important than individual good. In the absence of society and law and order, Aristotle thought, humans become selfish and evil. Yet when unified in a polls, humans can be the best of all creatures. Aristotle believed that only through society and government can people realize their full potential.
14 Western Europe in the Modem World
According to Aristotle, are people naturally good? Explain. How, did he argue, can people best realize their potential?
In his work Politics, Aristotle described three positive forms of government; monarchy (rule by a king or queen), aristocracy (rule by the noble or wealthy class), and constitutional rule (rule by the people). He believed that monarchy and aristocracy are good forms of government as long as the rulers are virtuous. If the rulers are not virtuous, monarchy and aristocracy can become negative and dangerous. This happens when rulers selfishly use their power to increase their own wealth, rather than to foster (support) the common good. Aristotle believed that democracy is the least dangerous form of government. His main concern with democracy was that because people have equal freedom, they might think they are equal in every way and fail to recognize their different strengths and weaknesses. Since some people are better educated and more suited to have political power, Aristotle argued that a belief in total equality would harm the society in general.
When did he think monarchy and aristocracy become dangerous?
What did Aristotle believe is the possible danger of democracy?
Aristotle believed that the ideal society is one in which everyone is educated to be morally virtuous, and all citizens participate in political society. He thought that the best form of government would be rule by properly educated members of the middle class. Power, he believed, should be given to the middle class because people in this class are free of the excesses found in the upper and lower classes. He thought that while the rich are too arrogant (prideful) and the poor may be vengeful (wanting revenge), the middle class can more easily be stable and rational. However, he also realized that this ideal is almost impossible to achieve. In his time, kings held most of the power, so Aristotle favored a system where kings would take advice on ruling from philosophers. He wrote in On Kingship, “[It is] not merely unnecessary for a king to be a philosopher, but even a disadvantage. Rather a king should take advantage of true philosophers. Then he would fill his reign with good deeds, not with good words.” By separating the philosophers from direct mle, Aristotle hoped to keep the philosophers independent in spirit. He felt that if the philosophers could not become wealthy from a position of direct power, they would be more honest.
                                 •         What did he believe is the best form of government?
         Text Box: © Teachers’ Curriculum InstituteWhy are members of the middle class best able to govern?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for Godot: A play in which nothing happens twice

A Play in Which Nothing Happens Twice    Translated into over a dozen languages, Waiting for Godot has been performed in little theatres and large theatres, by amateurs and professionals, on radio and television. Scarcely four decades old, Waiting for Godot has sold over a million copies in the original French and nearly that many in Beckett’s own English translation. Starring Steve Martin and Robin Williams, it was a smash hit at the Lincoln Center Theatre, with tickets available by lottery only. Quite an achievement for a comic drama in which absolutely nothing happens. (One reviewer, in fact, called it a two-act play in which nothing happens twice.) Waiting for Godot contains clowning of the highest degree, which attracts audiences, and likely the play’s enigma contributes to its appeal. Its symbolism is obscure or non- existent; its “message” is individual to each audience member, and the “nothing happens” becomes our daily existence. On a lonely country road near a tree...

Q: WHAT IS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"?

Q:      WHAT IS   SIGNIFICANCE   OF THE   TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:      IT    IS NOT GODOT BUT WAITING THAT MAKES THE WHOLE PLAY. HOW CAN YOU MAKE A CONVINCING CASE? Ans: Waiting for Godot is a multi—sided play with significant title. Its meanings and implications are complex. It is possible to look upon it as a clever farce or view it as a tragic exposition of human predicament. Its themes have certain topicality but at the same time, they possess a timeless validity and universality. It is an existentialistic play but at the same time mocks at the attitude of existentialism. It seems to have some religious implications even though it seems of be questioning profoundly the Christian concept of salvation and grace. The title "Waiting for Godot," suggests waiting for a mysterious stranger who has obvious symbolic dimensions and implication. Godot may be a representative, in Beckett's contemporary term ...

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical ...