Skip to main content

Mock Utopia: An ideal world



Mock Utopia: An ideal world
Jonathan Swift is a great satirist, moralist and above all an unforgettable literary figure. Hisage was full of corruption, follies and social evils. As a sensitive satirist Swift considered it his own responsibility to awake the society and make them aware about their follies and absurdities. He wanted to make his society pure from these evils. For this purpose he adopted the form of a travelogue because in those days travel books were very popular. It was his brilliant idea so that his message could reach the maximum number of people. The poets and writers of his age were also busy in reforming people by their writings. They presented the ideal
world “Utopia” before their readers and inspired them to follow all the good
rules and regulations so that the world could become an ideal world. They only described the good habits which they wanted in their countrymen and totally neglected the vices which were prevailing in the society. But, Swift as a satirist by nature could not forget or ignore the follies an dvices of the people. So he adopted a new method. He never presented any ideal in his book
“Gulliver’s Travels”. He exposed the vices of the          people so that they could remove them from their
society and made their life an ideal one. He did not present a “Utopian World” but a “Mock Utopian”.
His purpose was not different from that of his contemporaries but he tried to gain it through a different way. Hence, he has to face many false charges and criticism because the people were not ready to admit their mistakes and vices. He gave his readers real picture of his
society and as reality is always bitter so he was even charged as a ‘misanthropist’. But,
the fact is that instead of presenting a
“Utopian World”, he had presented the true picture which is very
corrupted. He hated men but love man. He had not only described dark aspects of his countrymen but he had also given them an ideal world which is free from all the vices. He had a reformatory and corrective aim behind his sever criticism as every satirist is an idealist from the core of his heart. When we go through the different voyages of Gulliver we find the human busy in all sort of negative activities. In the first voyage, we come across the dwarf of only 5 or 6 inches. They are
kind, generous, intelligent and hospitable. Here, Swift’s aim is to show the lack of these qualities in the English people. But, he criticizes the Lilliputians’ desire of 
expanding their country by enslaving the free people of nearby island, Blefuscu. In this voyage, the political institutions and politicians are condemned for they are busy in all mal-practices and never care about the people whose destiny is that their hand. The kings were also the sheep of the same flock. They prefer their favourities and select those officials which are best in deceiving others. So the world of Lilliputians had some good qualities but on the other hand they have a lot of follies in them. In the second voyage, Swift again presents the picture of human vulgarities through giants of  Brobdingnage. In this voyage, the new moneyed classes are criticized for their lust for more and more wealth. They run after money, as dogs after bone. They give so much importance to materialistic pursuits that they are ready to adopt any way fair or foul. Here, Swift changes his method a bit and satirizes the English politicians, kings, scientists, lords and so on. He does this not only through the words of Gulliver but by the king of Brobdingnage also. The king unveils the so called nobility of English and calls their society a heap of vices, rebellions, conspiracies, cruelty, hypocrisy, meanness, malice, envy and vulgarities and so on. He condemns the wars which were fought on useless issues. Here we can say that the main purpose of Swift in second voyage is to keep human beings away from lust of money and fighting. In the third voyage, there is less bitter satire. Here Swift presents the stupidities of his society in a comical way. We are amused to see scientists busy in useless experiments. They are trying to remove opposition among the politicians by operating the mind of two leaders of the opposition parties. However, there is a sever attack on the historians who give false information
about past great personalities without investigation. The man’s desire of immortality is also condemned through immortals of Lagado.
Finally, in the last voyage, Swift’s satire becomes most scathing and offensive. This is the most complicated part of the book. Here Gulliver finds Houyhnhnms (horses) gentle and free from all the vices but Yahoos (human beings) mischievous and obnoxious. Gulliver finds Houyhnhnms rational and noble whereas Yahoos nasty and shameful. So naturally he starts liking Houyhnhnms and disliking Yahoos. He equates Yahoos with man and thus begins to hate all the men. Here some critics make mistake that Swift is giving man an ideal way of life in the shape of Houyhnhnms. But this is a wrong notion, because, Gulliver too is severely criticized by Swift in this part for his over idealization of the Houyhnhnms. The aim of Swift here is to awake conscience of all mankind to become well behaved with each other.
In the end, we can say that Swift’s “Gulliver’s Travels” doesn’t present a Utopian world
rather a mock Utopian. Every satire of Swift moves us greatly and we start feeling guilty. Here it is right to say that Swift has described all the mal-practices of the people and preach them to reform themselves. In short, Swift instead of giving and ideal world has described a world full of vices and in this way he urges his reader to remove these vices and become ideal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for Godot: A play in which nothing happens twice

A Play in Which Nothing Happens Twice    Translated into over a dozen languages, Waiting for Godot has been performed in little theatres and large theatres, by amateurs and professionals, on radio and television. Scarcely four decades old, Waiting for Godot has sold over a million copies in the original French and nearly that many in Beckett’s own English translation. Starring Steve Martin and Robin Williams, it was a smash hit at the Lincoln Center Theatre, with tickets available by lottery only. Quite an achievement for a comic drama in which absolutely nothing happens. (One reviewer, in fact, called it a two-act play in which nothing happens twice.) Waiting for Godot contains clowning of the highest degree, which attracts audiences, and likely the play’s enigma contributes to its appeal. Its symbolism is obscure or non- existent; its “message” is individual to each audience member, and the “nothing happens” becomes our daily existence. On a lonely country road near a tree...

Q: WHAT IS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"?

Q:      WHAT IS   SIGNIFICANCE   OF THE   TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:      IT    IS NOT GODOT BUT WAITING THAT MAKES THE WHOLE PLAY. HOW CAN YOU MAKE A CONVINCING CASE? Ans: Waiting for Godot is a multi—sided play with significant title. Its meanings and implications are complex. It is possible to look upon it as a clever farce or view it as a tragic exposition of human predicament. Its themes have certain topicality but at the same time, they possess a timeless validity and universality. It is an existentialistic play but at the same time mocks at the attitude of existentialism. It seems to have some religious implications even though it seems of be questioning profoundly the Christian concept of salvation and grace. The title "Waiting for Godot," suggests waiting for a mysterious stranger who has obvious symbolic dimensions and implication. Godot may be a representative, in Beckett's contemporary term ...

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical ...