Skip to main content

Stream of Consciousness in “To the Light House”



Stream of Consciousness in “To the Light House”
Introduction
Virginia Woolf is considered the perfect master of stream of consciousness novel. The phrase “Stream of consciousness was first used William James in his “Principles of psychology” in 1890. Three novelists – Marcel Proust in France, James Joyce in Ireland and M. Richardson in England – were three main architects of this type of the novel. This new type of novel flourished during the period between 1915 to 1939, and it was Virginia Woolf who gave this type of novel a proper shape and adequate refinement.
Study of Human Psyche,
The chief object of the stream of consciousness novel is the study of human psyche or human consciousness. The novelists of this technique believe that human actions are determined more by the sub-conscious and the unconscious than by the conscious. Instead of a tendency at concentration around a limited issue, those novelists fly off in an eccentric manner in different directions. They have a tendency in such novels is not known by what he says or does. He is known by what he thinks in his mind. The action moves backward and forward freely in time, there is no chronological, forward movement, but a zigzag, sinuous movement from the past to the present, and from the present to the past. In place of external action and violent deeds. There is the interior monologue. This type of monologue is a method or process of recording or describing the inner experiences of characters.
Changing expression, changing thought.
In the novel, “To the lighthouse”, Woolf reveals consciousness. Mrs. Ramsay’s character is revealed through her thoughts. She moves in her mind, from one thought to another without any chronological order. For example, she sees through window the together movement of Mr. Bank and Lily and starts thinking about their marriage. Then she looks around the house and starts thinking of shabbiness of her house. The mat was fading, the wall-paper was flapping etc. Then her eyes fall on books and she thinks that she has collected so may books but has not read them. The fourth thought she has of the swish girl- Minta and her father. Wo we come to know that Mrs. Ramsay is quite domestic and caring lady.
Association with different characters.
Stream of conscious develops association with different characters. And this association with others also takes a character into stream of consciousness. For example, Lily in the last part of the novel, irritated by the pressure of Mr. Ramsay goes into her past memories and finds association with Mrs. Ramsay. This association with Mrs. Ramsay then forces her to change her behavior with Mr. Ramsay and then she is able to complete her painting. Similarly it is the association of Mrs. Ramsay with Swish girl Minta that she goes into her thoughts and starts thinking about her and her dying father. Mr. Banks has association with Mr. Ramsay and thinks about him that he was the friend of his youth.
External action.
External action is another stimulant for the character’s movement into stream of consciousness. For example, the together movement of Lily and Banks forces Mrs. Ramsay to think about their marriage. In the third part of the novel. the external action of different characters’ search for the signs of Mrs. Ramsay takes Lily into her thoughts and she remembers her frankness, her friendliness and her sympathetic nature. Similarly, the dinner party which arranged by Mrs. Ramsay soon floats her into stream of consciousness. She thinks about Mr. Banks’ loneliness. Then she seizes on Minta and Paul and thinks that are engaged.
Emotional Links.
Emotional links also prone a source for the character’s swimming into stream of consciousness. In the Ramsay family, children have not emotional links with their father. So Mr. Ramsay’s assertion that there will be no going to the lighthouse as weather will not be fine, put his son James into angry thoughts against his father so much that he thinks about killing him with any weapon. But the children have emotional links with their mother and when Mr. Banks sees Mrs. Ramsay reading James, he thinks that a love of this kind makes one to feel that there is no barbarity in the world now and the reign of chaos has ended too in it. While Lily thinks that people should practice such love in their life. She also feels sad as she is till unmarried and has not been alike to achieve the reality in life. So she has feeling of inadequacy with painting, for she does not know exactly what to paint, although she has keen desire to paint.
Interior Monologues.
Virginia Woolf, in order to bring her characters into their stream of consciousness, also involves them in interior monologue and through her monologue we come to know about the story of Minta Doyle that she is fo9nd of going out for walks with Paul Rayley after lunch. We too come to know through this interior monologue the desire of Mrs. Ramsay that both should marry because she likes Paul as he is not very brilliant like Charles Tansley and other intellectuals who write dissertations. This interior monologue also informs us that Mrs. Ramsay was once accused by a woman of having robbed her of her daughter’s love. She was also charged for dominating people, interfering in their affairs and making people act after her own desires. This is what Minta’s mother had said about her and now she thinks that she is responsible for Minta to her parents and it is her duty to see that she is well married. Then she thinks that her favorite children James and Cam should not grow. Once they lose their childhood, there will be no chance to recover. She feels extremely happy when she carries a baby in her arms. Life bounds in many problems- suffering, death and poverty. Still she wants that people should marry and produce children.
Conclusion  
To conclude we can say, Virginia Woolf makes a skillful use of stream of consciousness technique. She has clearly avoided the drawbacks of this technique and has given form and coherence to her material

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Waiting for Godot: A play in which nothing happens twice

A Play in Which Nothing Happens Twice    Translated into over a dozen languages, Waiting for Godot has been performed in little theatres and large theatres, by amateurs and professionals, on radio and television. Scarcely four decades old, Waiting for Godot has sold over a million copies in the original French and nearly that many in Beckett’s own English translation. Starring Steve Martin and Robin Williams, it was a smash hit at the Lincoln Center Theatre, with tickets available by lottery only. Quite an achievement for a comic drama in which absolutely nothing happens. (One reviewer, in fact, called it a two-act play in which nothing happens twice.) Waiting for Godot contains clowning of the highest degree, which attracts audiences, and likely the play’s enigma contributes to its appeal. Its symbolism is obscure or non- existent; its “message” is individual to each audience member, and the “nothing happens” becomes our daily existence. On a lonely country road near a tree...

Q: WHAT IS SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"?

Q:      WHAT IS   SIGNIFICANCE   OF THE   TITLE "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:      IT    IS NOT GODOT BUT WAITING THAT MAKES THE WHOLE PLAY. HOW CAN YOU MAKE A CONVINCING CASE? Ans: Waiting for Godot is a multi—sided play with significant title. Its meanings and implications are complex. It is possible to look upon it as a clever farce or view it as a tragic exposition of human predicament. Its themes have certain topicality but at the same time, they possess a timeless validity and universality. It is an existentialistic play but at the same time mocks at the attitude of existentialism. It seems to have some religious implications even though it seems of be questioning profoundly the Christian concept of salvation and grace. The title "Waiting for Godot," suggests waiting for a mysterious stranger who has obvious symbolic dimensions and implication. Godot may be a representative, in Beckett's contemporary term ...

VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT.

Q:      TO WHAT EXTANT VLADIMIR AND ESTRAGON ARE METAPHORS OF HUMANITY IN "WAITING FOR GODOT"? Q:       VLADIMIR     AND      ESTRAGON    ARE REPRESENTATION OF MAN IN GENERAL. ACCEPT OR REJECT THE STATEMENT. Q:      MAJOR CHARACTERS IN "WAITING FOR GODOT" ARE HUMAN BEINGS IN SEARCH FOR MEANINGS IN THE MEANINGLESS, HOSTILE UNIVERSE. Ans: Authors bring into play different modus operandi in their writings. Samuel Beckett makes use of allusions and references to characters to help the reader understand what the characters stand for. In his drama Waiting for Godot, Beckett's two main characters, Estragon and Vladimir, are symbolised as man. Separate they are two different sides of man, but together they represent man as a whole. In Waiting for Godot, Beckett uses Estragon and Vladimir to symbolize man's physical and mental state. Estragon represents the physical ...